Okay, so I’ve been getting some responses on Twitter (@circlelovely) lately because I have been critical of Governor Dayton’s compromise (give-away) to Republicans. That’s fine…everyone is entitled to their opinion and I am genuinely happy to see that state workers will be getting back to work soon and that many of the problems and hardships of the shutdown will be over soon. All of that is a good thing and I am very happy for it.

Kurt Zellers and Amy Koch are already studying other opportunities to fleece Minnesota's working class. (Photo: scgaproperty.com)
However, my concern is the overall impact this deal is going to have on Minnesota. Overall, I think this deal stinks and it appears that most DFLers in the legislature are not going to vote for it. In fact, DFL Senate Minority Leader Tom Bakk from Cook told MPR’s Midmorning straightaway: “I don’t plan on voting for a borrowing proposal.” This sentiment was echoed by DFL House Minority Leader Rep. Paul Thissen of Minneapolis, who said he had serious concerns with it said that it “is truly a Republican proposal.”
So, let me lay out the case why I think this is a bad deal both for Minnesota, the DFL and Governor Dayton.

After hearing about GOP-butchers, 9 out of 10 cattle are against "cuts." (Photo: Glen Watson)
1) There are no new tax increases. Governor Dayton campaigned on this point–that there would be new taxes on Minnesota’s top earners. I can tell you that getting tax increases passed at the end of the next biennium is going to be that much more difficult–it is going to get more difficult to raise taxes as the election for the Governorship gets closer–this was the best chance Dayton had to get new tax increases. The state desperately needs new revenue–we have had budget problems going all the way back to Jesse Ventura’s tax giveaways. This is not something that is going to go away–and cuts alone aren’t going to get the job done. Minnesotans come to rely on government services (the outcry against the shutdown is evidence of this) and having good services contributes greatly to what we consider a high quality of life here in Minnesota.
2) The budget gap gets fixed with more gimmicks. This is the main reason why Fitch Ratings downgraded Minnesota’s bond rating from AAA to AA+. For more on why this is a bad thing, see my previous post: http://circlelovely.wordpress.com/2011/07/08/minnesotas-bond-rating-lowered/.
3) From a political standpoint, the timing of the deal was terrible. Dayton had just wrapped up a tour around the state to drum up support for his budget plan. This should have been part of a strategy to keep pressure on the Republicans, eventually getting enough of the rank-and-file members to crack under the pressure so that he could get tax increases and fix the budget problem in a more permanent way. So it is baffling why he then made this rather conciliatory offer to the GOP right after coming back from his trip around the state. He had the initiative and was starting to gain the upper hand and then gave it up.

Mark Dayton has nothing left up his sleeve now that he's given it all away to Republicans. (Photo: examiner.com)
4) Dayton is going to get blamed for the shutdown. I am worried that because Dayton blinked first (gave in), he will be held responsible for the shutdown by the voters and the Republicans will be able to exploit this in the next election.
Don’t get me wrong, I still like Mark Dayton, overall am happy that he is Governor (I can’t imagine the world of hurt we’d be in right now with Tom Emmer as Governor), and if he runs for reelection I will most likely still vote for him again. I just think he handled this whole situation badly. It was a squandered political opportunity and it was a squandered opportunity to get Minnesota on better financial footing.
However, I am happy that state workers will be going back to work soon and that Minnesota will be “open for business” once more.